Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 06:53

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
'The Life of Chuck' might leave you brushing away tears — or scratching your head - NPR
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is "North Of Zero" - MLB Trade Rumors
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What was your most embarrassing wardrobe malfunction in public?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Missing link star? Why this 'teenage vampire' white dwarf has scientists so excited - Space
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
7 Best High-Volume Foods for Weight Loss, According to Dietitians - AOL.com